A few quick thoughts on the nomination of Samuel Alito for the Supreme Court:
:
1. When I was watching the ticker on the news this morning I saw a quote from Sen. Schumer that "It is sad that the president felt he had to pick a nominee likely to..." and then I thought to myself "divide America" which is of course what he said, adding "instead of choosing a nominee in the mold of Sandra Day O'Connor, who would unify us." The talking points are just that predictable. I notice the nomination has also been declared "controversial."
:
2. I find the talk of insensitivity against Italian-Americans because of the use of the term "Scalito" pretty lame.
:
3. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a very left-wing Supreme Court justice was confirmed by the Senate 96-3. Steven Breyer, another liberal nominee, was confirmed 87-9. I will be shocked if Democrats extend nearly the same courtesy to Bush's pick of Alito. I think he will have at least 30 votes against.
:
4. Alito was confirmed by a unanimous vote in 1990 after George Bush nominated him to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit. Here is a list of some of the Democratic senators that voted for him then -- let's see how many vote for him this time around.
:
Update: Forgot to mention Schumer's comment that the selection of Alito will make the court "less diverse." Strange, I thought the Supreme Court was about finding the best qualified people. Last I checked being a certain gender or race doesn't make you better able to interpret the Constitution, which should be the only thing that matters.
:
Another one: Polipundit predicts his confirmation. I think he's right.
:
And again: More Schumer idiocy.
No comments:
Post a Comment