Saturday, January 31, 2009

To save the planet, get rich

Getting rich has many virtues. It allows people to live more comfortable and rewarding lives. It's also good for those around them (less likely to commit crime, more likely to give better presents, throw better parties, etc. etc.), including the environment. After all, you need to be relatively rich to afford things like catalytic converters and recycling programs.

Indeed, extreme environmental degradation tends to be found in the third world where environmental protections are a distant priority to more pressing matters such eating, obtaining shelter and proper clothing. It's hard to be a good steward of the environment when your primary focus is survival. As countries grow richer, however, they can focus more resources on the environment. The latest example (via instapundit) of this is the rain forest in Central and South America:
The land where Marta Ortega de Wing raised hundreds of pigs until 10 years ago is being overtaken by galloping jungle — palms, lizards and ants.

Instead of farming, she now shops at the supermarket and her grown children and grandchildren live in places like Panama City and New York.


Here, and in other tropical countries around the world, small holdings like Ms. Ortega de Wing’s — and much larger swaths of farmland — are reverting to nature, as people abandon their land and move to the cities in search of better livings.


These new “secondary” forests are emerging in Latin America, Asia and other tropical regions at such a fast pace that the trend has set off a serious debate about whether saving primeval rain forest — an iconic environmental cause — may be less urgent than once thought. By one estimate, for every acre of rain forest cut down each year, more than 50 acres of new forest are growing in the tropics on land that was once farmed, logged or ravaged by natural disaster.


“There is far more forest here than there was 30 years ago,” said Ms. Ortega de Wing, 64, who remembers fields of mango trees and banana plants.


...About 38 million acres of original rain forest are being cut down every year, but in 2005, according to the most recent “State of the World’s Forests Report” by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, there were an estimated 2.1 billion acres of potential replacement forest growing in the tropics — an area almost as large as the United States. The new forest included secondary forest on former farmland and so-called degraded forest, land that has been partly logged or destroyed by natural disasters like fires and then left to nature. In Panama by the 1990s, the last decade for which data is available, the rain forest is being destroyed at a rate of 1.3 percent each year. The area of secondary forest is increasing by more than 4 percent yearly, Dr. Wright estimates.


With the heat and rainfall in tropical Panama, new growth is remarkably fast. Within 15 years, abandoned land can contain trees more than 100 feet high. Within 20, a thick rain-forest canopy forms again. Here in the lush, misty hills, it is easy to see rain-forest destruction as part of a centuries-old cycle of human civilization and wilderness, in which each in turn is cleared and replaced by the other. The Mayans first cleared lands here that are now dense forest. The area around Gamboa, cleared when the Panama Canal was built, now looks to the untrained eye like the wildest of jungles.
And why is this occurring? Growing prosperity and better technology:
In Latin America and Asia, birthrates have dropped drastically; most people have two or three children. New jobs tied to global industry, as well as improved transportation, are luring a rural population to fast-growing cities. Better farming techniques and access to seed and fertilizer mean that marginal lands are no longer farmed because it takes fewer farmers to feed a growing population.

Gumercinto Vásquez, a stooped casual laborer who was weeding a field in Chilibre in the blistering sun, said it had become hard for him to find work because so many farms had been abandoned.


“Very few people around here are farming these days,” he said.


...Still, the fate of secondary forests lies not just in biology. A global recession could erase jobs in cities, driving residents back to the land.
The best path to saving the rain forests is via economic growth. In the U.S. we can play our part by passing free trade agreements with these countries (we should pause to note that the U.S.-Colombia FTA, which Democrats have blocked, is a prime example) and buy their products. Sweatshop labor isn't just good for people, it's good for the planet!

No comments: