Here's one big reason I don't buy into accusations that the economy suffered under the George W. Bush Administration because of insufficient regulation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
"To get rich is glorious." -- Deng Xiaoping. This is perhaps the smartest thing ever uttered by a member of the Communist Party.
About me
I have a BA in International Affairs and MA in International Trade and Investment Policy. I live in Washington, DC and work for a Fortune Global 500 company as a public policy analyst.
My Twitter updates
Subscribe via email
Subscribe Now: Feed Icon
Blog Archive
Blogroll
- Cafe Hayek
- Calafia Beach Pundit
- Carpe Diem
- Cato @ Liberty
- Club For Growth
- Coyote Blog
- Econlog
- Economix
- Freakonomics
- Free Exchange
- Greg Mankiw
- Instapundit
- John Stossel
- Marginal Revolution
- Market Urbanism
- Megan McArdle
- Reason: Hit & Run blog
- Scott Lincicome (trade policy blog)
- Taxing Tennessee
- Think Markets
Friend blogs
Recommended reading
Greatest hits: Some of my fav posts
ShareThis
3 comments:
"Regulatory" in this chart does not refer strictly to economic regulation. Rather, it includes both economic and social regulations.
Ah, good point. Well, there's still this graph:
http://www.businessinsider.com/2009/1/enough-of-this-nonsense-george-bush-grew-the-sec
Oh, and this too:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_oKWxWOEilyQ/SrOVIYl43VI/AAAAAAAABJ0/IgtD_kymaJY/s1600-h/Picture+3.png
Post a Comment